<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Butko, N.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Movellan, J.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Infomax Control of Eye Movements</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">active information gathering</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">autonomous computer program</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">autonomous physical agent</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Computer vision</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">dynamic tracking task</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Eye movement</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eye movement strategy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">face detection</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">faces</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Infomax control</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">motor system</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">object detection</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">optimal control</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">optimal eye movement controller</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">policy gradient</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">probabilistic model</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sensory system</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">static scenes</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Visual Perception</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">visual search</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">visual system</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">91-107</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.0470588);&quot;&gt;Recently, infomax methods of optimal control have begun to reshape how we think about active information gathering. We show how such methods can be used to formulate the problem of choosing where to look. We show how an optimal eye movement controller can be learned from subjective experiences of information gathering, and we explore in simulation properties of the optimal controller. This controller outperforms other eye movement strategies proposed in the literature. The learned eye movement strategies are tailored to the specific visual system of the learner-we show that agents with different kinds of eyes should follow different eye movement strategies. Then we use these insights to build an autonomous computer program that follows this approach and learns to search for faces in images faster than current state-of-the-art techniques. The context of these results is search in static scenes, but the approach extends easily, and gives further efficiency gains, to dynamic tracking tasks. A limitation of infomax methods is that they require probabilistic models of uncertainty of the sensory system, the motor system, and the external world. In the final section of this paper, we propose future avenues of research by which autonomous physical agents may use developmental experience to subjectively characterize the uncertainties they face.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">91</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Whitehill, J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Littlewort, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fasel, I.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bartlett, M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Movellan, J.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Toward Practical Smile Detection</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Algorithms</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Artificial intelligence</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Automated</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">automatic facial expression recognition research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Biological Pattern Recognition</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Biometry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Computer simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Computer vision</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Computer-Assisted</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Face</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Face and gesture recognition</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">face recognition</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">feature representation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">human-level expression recognition accuracy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">illumination conditions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Image databases</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Image Enhancement</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Image Interpretation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">image registration image representation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">learning (artificial intelligence)</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">machine learning approaches</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Machine Learning Models</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">n Humans</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">object detection</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">practical smile detection</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reproducibility of Results</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sensitivity and Specificity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Smiling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Subtraction Technique</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">training data set</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">visual databases</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">31</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2106-2111</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;&quot;&gt;Machine learning approaches have produced some of the highest reported performances for facial expression recognition. However, to date, nearly all automatic facial expression recognition research has focused on optimizing performance on a few databases that were collected under controlled lighting conditions on a relatively small number of subjects. This paper explores whether current machine learning methods can be used to develop an expression recognition system that operates reliably in more realistic conditions. We explore the necessary characteristics of the training data set, image registration, feature representation, and machine learning algorithms. A new database, GENKI, is presented which contains pictures, photographed by the subjects themselves, from thousands of different people in many different real-world imaging conditions. Results suggest that human-level expression recognition accuracy in real-life illumination conditions is achievable with machine learning technology. However, the data sets currently used in the automatic expression recognition literature to evaluate progress may be overly constrained and could potentially lead research into locally optimal algorithmic solutions.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2106</style></section></record></records></xml>