01706nas a2200337 4500008004100000020002200041245008400063210006900147260002600216520061900242653001400861653003400875653003300909653001000942653001400952653002800966653003600994653002001030653001301050653002001063653002401083653001501107653002301122653001801145653002601163653001501189653002301204100001501227700001701242856010901259 2008 eng d a978-1-4244-2212-800aA barebones communicative robot based on social contingency and Infomax Control0 abarebones communicative robot based on social contingency and In aMunichbIEEEc08/20083 a

In this paper, we present a barebones robot which is capable of interacting with humans based on social contingency. It expands the previous work of a contingency detector into having both human-model updating (developmental capability) and policy improvement (learning capability) based on the framework of Infomax control. The proposed new controller interacts with humans in both active and responsive ways handling the turn-taking between them.

10aActuators10abarebones communicative robot10aCommunication system control10aDelay10aDetectors10aHuman robot interaction10ahuman-model updating capability10ahumanoid robots10aHydrogen10aInfomax control10aman-machine systems10aPediatrics10apolicy improvement10aRobot control10aRobot sensing systems10aScheduling10asocial contingency1 aTanaka, F.1 aMovellan, J. uhttps://rubi.ucsd.edu/content/barebones-communicative-robot-based-social-contingency-and-infomax-control02582nas a2200373 4500008004100000020002200041245007500063210006900138260003100207520141200238653002801650653003201678653002201710653001601732653001001748653001401758653002301772653002001795653001601815653002801831653002001859653002801879653002301907653001901930653002801949653002201977653003001999653001102029100001502040700001802055700001502073700001702088856010302105 2008 eng d a978-1-4244-2661-400aBuilding a more effective teaching robot using apprenticeship learning0 aBuilding a more effective teaching robot using apprenticeship le aMonterey, CAbIEEc08/20083 a

What defines good teaching? While attributes such as timing, responsiveness to social cues, and pacing of material clearly play a role, it is difficult to create a comprehensive specification of what it means to be a good teacher. On the other hand, it is relatively easy to obtain examples of expert teaching behavior by observing a real teacher. With this inspiration as our guide, we investigated apprenticeship learning methods [1] that use data recorded from expert teachers as a means of improving the teaching abilities of RUBI, a social robot immersed in a classroom of 18-24 month old children. While this approach has achieved considerable success in mechanical control, such as automated helicopter flight [2], until now there has been little work on applying it to the field of social robotics. This paper explores two particular approaches to apprenticeship learning, and analyzes the models of teaching that each approach learns from the data of the human teacher. Empirical results indicate that the apprenticeship learning paradigm, though still nascent in its use in the social robotics field, holds promise, and that our proposed methods can already extract meaningful teaching models from demonstrations of a human expert.

10aapprenticeship learning10aautomated helicopter flight10aAutomatic control10aData mining10aDelay10aeducation10aEducational robots10aexpert teaching10aHelicopters10aHuman-robot interaction10ahumanoid robots10aHumans Learning systems10amechanical control10arobot teaching10aRobotics and Automation10aRUBI social robot10atime 18 month to 24 month10atiming1 aRuvolo, P.1 aWhitehill, J.1 aVirnes, M.1 aMovellan, J. uhttps://rubi.ucsd.edu/content/building-more-effective-teaching-robot-using-apprenticeship-learning